There is an antitrust suit against Google, which as the Justice Department says, is because Google has abused its market power to bully trade, and protect its monopoly and thwart competition.
It sounds similar to Microsoft suit some 25 years back. In both the cases Big Tech has been accused of using its market power to cut competition unfairly.
Of course, the Microsoft suit received wider attention, and it is doubtful whether the Google trial will command the same attention.
Microsoft was a lone tech titan in the 1990s, and its Head Bill Gates was a celebrity. The trial started in 1998, and the testimony was recorded over eight months. It was widely covered by the news agencies. The proceeding received coverage in the NYT daily. Many important concepts were discussed during the trial — network effects and switching costs.
Microsoft’s defence was that the snippets of text were taken out of context, and were not evidence of its anticompetitive conduct. Lawyers from Justice Department and States were of the view that they have clinching evidence.
A federal judge found Microsoft guilty of violating antitrust laws. However, he was not in favour of the remedy put forward by the government — break the organisation.
In Google case. Justice Department refers to the Microsoft case and the tactics it adopted in 1990s. Google weilds its might in online search as Microsoft did in operating system (Windows).
Netscape, the pioneer of internet browsing, bore the burnt of Microsoft’s bundling of its Explorer browser with Windows. Since 90 per cent computers were loaded with Windows, it had the key to access Internet.
Google has to work with partners and pay them — smart phone companies, browsers and other devices.
Though Google’s tie-up with Apple and Samsung made it the default search engine, it is legal as it is in the best interests of the consumers. It reduces cost for device makers.
Google pays more than $10 billion a year to maintain its position as the default search engine on web browsers and mobile devices and thus stifles competition. This is what the US Justice department said at the start of the trial in Washington.
The government lawyer said that this is the case about the future of Internet. The evidence will show that there is default exclusivity to block the rivals.
Google controls 89 per cent of the online search market. The company can afford to pay billions for defaults as it is uniquely powerful.
Google has abused its position for the last 12 years by monopolising general search.
The first phase of the trial will assess whether google has illegally monopolised the online search market. The decision could be taken next year (2024) on whether Google broke the law. If the justice department succeeds, at the second phase of the trial, may seek remedies to break the search business from other products like Android and Google Maps.
Microsoft operated in the 1990s in world that flirted with internet. It was an early tide. E-commerce came later, and then there was a race to jump on the digital bandwagon.
Then came the mobile computing. Blackberry was used basically as an email device, and was introduced in 1999. The new millennium has witnessed the smart phone era since 2007. In the early days, one got online through a computer (PC) that ran on Windows Operating System. Microsoft entered into media business in 1996 and partnered with NBC.
Since then, Microsoft has stopped selling Windows. It has entered cloud computing. And now it has partnered with OpenAI to enter generative AI field. Microsoft Bing is now powered by ChatGPT.